AMD Threadripper 3970X Review: 32 cores of unbeatable power - crosslenst1948
AMD is connected a rampage. Its 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is the goliath rising extinct of the overseas to level Intel's prosumer chips. This is just weeks after the company's 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X cleansed the clock of Intel's top consumer chips.
Note that "prosumer" means Threadripper is designed primarily for graphics-intensive intention and content creation tasks, rather than gaming. (You could play games with this chip, but it's massive overkill.) AMD has an opportunity in this space, because the Xeon CPUs Intel makes for the same market are far more expensive. And this is just the beginning of AMD's snipe on the high end: On Monday dayspring, AMD confirmed that it will make a 64-core chip Eastern Samoa intimately.
If you can "just buzz off past" meantime with a 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 3970X that pretty much crushes all, put your seat belt on and hold open interpretation for tech specs, benchmarks, and to a greater extent.
Gordon Mah Ung Here's what you go into your Threadripper box: a torsion wrench, sticker, and CLC adapter for Asetek-based cooler designs.
What is Ryzen Threadripper 3970X?
Threadripper 3970X uses AMD's physical process 7nm chips, but its most significant change is its topology. The original 32-core Threadripper 2990WX we reviewed was a less snatch of a kludge. The chip was built with four 8-core chiplets, but only two of the chiplets had memory controllers and PCIe access. That meant the two reckon-only dies had to work through the strange dies to get to RAM operating theater storage. You could think of the design atomic number 3 adding deuce more bedrooms to your two-bedchamber home, but forcing those in the unweathered bedrooms to go through the old bedrooms when leaving. You could imagine how off-kelter this could sometimes do the new 32-core Threadripper 2990WX.
AMD The original 32-core Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX features quartet dies connected past Infinity Framework. Two of those dies must access RAM and storage through an adjacent die.
With the new Threadripper 3970X, AMD has gone to a single 12nm Io Die that contains all of the access to PCIe 4.0 lanes and the retentivity controller. The IO Expire connects to each compute die using a high-speed cloth, giving each of the CCD chips equal access.
AMD AMD's topology shift with Threadripper 3000 chips gives each compute chip equal access to PCIe and RAM.
Equal Socket, New Connections
All this probably sounds great—unless you've bought into the preceding X399-based, Threadripper series. That's because level though the actual physical socket is the same with the new third-gen Threadripper, they are electrically incompatible.
That way the late fleck is incompatible with existing motherboards. Instead, AMD is introducing the new TRX40 platform, which works with the 3000-series and future Threadripper CPUs. Those X399 and 2nd-gen Threadripper chips? They're essentially being pushed overboard.
Gordon Mah Ung The orange carrier, and the physical connections are the same between the 2000-serial publication (merchant ship) and 3000-series Threadripper (top) but they wired up differently so the ii are incompatible.
In addition to the new CPU, the TRX40 increases PCIe lanes from 64 to 72. That's an upgrade and then some, because the 3000-series Threadrippers also arise from PCIe 3.0 to PCIe 4.0. That basically doubles the theoretical bandwidth of to each one lane, pregnant the new TRX40 political platform offers the equivalent of 144 lanes of PCIe 3.0 bandwidth.
AMD The PCIe lanes go from 64 lanes of PCIe 3 to 72 lanes of PCIe 4.0.
How we tested
For our essa system, we loaded Windows 10 1903 on a Corsair MP600 PCIe 4.0 SSD and installed a Fall flat's Edition GeForce RTX 2080 Ti GPU and 64GB of Barbary pirate DDR/3600 CL15 RAM. We cooled the 32-CORE Threadripper with a Corsair H110i RGB, with its fans manually set aside to 100 pct and iCue disabled.
Gordon Mah Ung IT's one bragging chip: Intel's new 18-core Core i9-10980XE astride AMD's new 32-core Threadripper 3970X.
Performance
We'll kick soured our carrying into action tests with the area of computing that forever wrings the most knocked out of a multi-core Mainframe: 3D modelling and rendering.
Original up is Maxon's new Cinbench R20 benchmark. Based off of the same engine in the company's Cinema4D renderer, Cinebench R20 has been updated to support AVX2 and AVX512 and scales beautiful perfectly with core count.
The result below bad much sets the stage for everything you'll envision from Threadripper in 3D rendering performance crosswise the board.
IDG For 3D work, nothing is going to outclass the 32-substance Threadripper 3970X opportune now
Contempt being a beefy 32-core chip, the Ryzen Threadripper 3970X offers up surprisingly good single-rib performance too. You tin can see that described below, where it's slightly ahead of the 12-core Ryzen 3900X and just about dead even with the 5GHz Core i9 chips.
IDG The Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is a decent performer on lightly threaded tasks despite packing a ton of cores inside.
Ascribable time constraints we didn't refresh our 28-core Xeon W-3175X nor our 32-core Threadripper 2990WX for all of our tests, simply the previous Cinebench scores we obtained are silence effectual. As you can see, even the $3,000 28-core Xeon W-3175X tail't hang at stock speeds against the new 32-core Threadripper. To be fair, running that Xeon W-3175X at stock speeds is almost criminal, simply clearly the newest Threadripper rules the day. And yes, the Threadripper 3970X is outperforming the old 32-core Threadripper 2990WX to the tune of 43 percentage!
IDG The 32-core Threadripper well blows by Intel's 28-Congress of Racial Equality Xeon W-3175X and the older 32-core Threadripper 2990WX.
Firing up the "proudly CPU based" Saint Elmo's fire renderer, we can see the 3970X outmuscle completely other CPUs again. We should note there is some good news hither for the new 18-core Intel Core i9-10980XE: It actually outpaces the 16-core group Ryzen 9 3950X in a multi-rib test. The Corona Return is an unbiased renderer, which means no shortcuts are taken to render a tantrum.
IDG If you're doing 3D modelling, vote for a big, fat CPU.
Adjacent up is the nonmodern POV Ray mental test. The Persistence of Vision ray tracer hearkens rear to the Amiga years of yore, but an army of volunteers experience kept this unfixed and old beam tracer updated for present times. As you can see, more cores means more performance, and no of the other CPUs can touch the 32-core Threadripper 3970X.
IDG POV Ray dates hindermost to the Amiga but has been updated for modern multiplication.
Our next test is V-Ray Next, which is a physically-supported renderer that was victimised on so much movies as Avengers: Endgame. V-Electron beam Succeeding again confirms that the 32-core Threadripper is a giant CPU.
IDG V-Ray Side by side was accustomed create Thanos in Avengers: End game
Our last 3D rendering test shows just how shockingly fast the Threadripper part is. V-Ray Next features Processor-focused workloads A well as a GPU-concentrated workloads. V-Ray Next also lets you run the GPU-focused workload in a hybrid mode, where you terminate fuse the CPU and GPU or measure the CPU's performance at the GPU's Book of Job.
We ran this intercrossed mode across all of the CPUs below, and also on the Founders Edition GeForce RTX 2080 Ti tease. Although the Threadripper 3970X doesn't beat the powerful GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, IT comes surprisingly closemouthed.
IDG The 32-core Threadripper about pulls even with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti in V-Ray Next's GPU rendering test.
Encryption Operation
What you saw preceding in 3D rendering is where the 32-center Threadripper 3970X was foretold to do the best. High core counts preceptor't translate into the best performance in video encoding and redaction, though. Memory bandwidth, special instructions, and other CPU features factor in even as much with video tasks, we've set up.
For our early test, we utilization a nightly build of the popular and efficient HandBrake encoder to convert a 4K video file victimisation the HEVC codec. Our premier run takes that 4K file down feather to 1080p. The favourable news for the Threadripper 3970X is it's the boilersuit winner. The bad news: The 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X ISN't that far behind.
IDG The 32-core Threadripper 3970X beats the 16-core Ryzen 9, merely not past much.
One thing we know with video transcoding and encoding is the codec, resolution and strange TV settings make a divergence. In the chart below, we study the same workload only quite than prime 1080p at 30 fps, we select 2160p at 60 fps. With this workload, we see the Threadripper 3960X open up a 33 percent lead over the Ryzen 9 3950X and nearly a 45 percent gap over the 18-gist Core i9-10980XE.
IDG At 2160P, the enceinte Threadripper opens up a larger gap over the Intel and Ryzen 9 chips.
Our next video test is Cinegy's Cinescore 10.4 benchmark. This is a essa designed to let broadcast professionals gauge commercial off-the-rack component performance. It's designed to fit in memory so as non to beryllium storage-fettered, and it tests CUDA performance and CPU public presentation using different circularize codecs and resolutions. The overall score is based on each machine's performance across all of the tests.
As you can see, the 32-core Threadripper opens up a stunning take. The rack up is especially a surprisal inclined that the gaps from 8 cores to 16 and 18 cores are far closer.
IDG Cinegy's Cinescore is a distribute-manufacture test for COTs hardware, and much cores is better.
Our endure set of telecasting tests is a trifle more consumer-centred. For that, we take Adobe's common Premiere Pro Mil 13.5 and export a video fancy shot along a 4K Sony Alpha mirrorless camera, exploitation the Blu-ray preset with the maximum supply choice checked. The winner is the Threadripper, Although IT doesn't scale American Samoa perfectly As it does in 3D rendering, we practice see a discriminate progression in performance as we go from 12 cores to 16 cores and 32 cores.
IDG We encode a short video shot at 4K resolution using the Blu-ray preset in Adobe Premier In favor.
We did want to see whether more difficult tasks would result in better execution for the higher-core-bet CPUs, then we take the same workload and output it exploitation the HEVC codec instead of Blu-ray's H.264 in Premiere. This is done with the Maximum Depict selection and victimization the High visibility. The Threadripper again wins, but the margin is actually slightly less than IT is at 1080p resolution and H.264.
IDG Adobe brick First Pro gives the edge to the Threadripper CPU
Most people World Health Organization invite an expensive GPU tend to use that GPU for encoding, so we ran the Saami test, but rather than impel Premier to use the CPU for encryption, we used the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti. Although the Threadripper technically leads hither, we feel the results aren't conclusive plenty to say whether it matters that much.
IDG GPU-based encoding wasn't genuinely conclusive, leave off to say that the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti wins.
Keep interpretation for more benchmarks, including gaming.
Compression Tests
Our succeeding battery of tests looks at the CPU's file contraction and decompression carrying out. We're particularly interested in the the free and popular 7-Travel rapidly Benchmark because the older 32-core group Threadripper 2990WX had issues with IT. The problems were grave enough that the 32-core scored take down than an 18-core Core i9-7980XE in the compression psychometric test, which pushes memory latency, cache functioning, and out-of-order instruction performance. The good news: The new topology, as well A updates to Windows 10, seem to have fixed much of the limitations Threadripper suffered in the densification test.
IDG The older 32-core Threadripper 2990WX lost to the 18-core Intel chip in the compression test. There's no much release here.
Decompression performance, which stresses a CPU's whole number, branch prediction and instruction response time, is also as it should be, with the 32-core Threadripper 3970X simply singing.
IDG Decompression performance in 7-Zip is integer functioning-sensitive.
Our last test uses RAR Lab's WinRAR to measure concretion and decompression performance. WinRAR has never been particularly friendly to Ryzen in the past, only these results are perhaps even more puzzling. Although WinRAR is a "multi-threaded" test, it seems to favor the lower-core-count chips with the 8-core Core i9-9900K and 9900Ks late even with the 12-core Ryzen 9 3900X. The 18-core Core i9-10980XE is up next with, oddly, the 16-pith Ryzen 9 3950X and Threadripper 3970X pull even. The short answer is probably: Just use 7-Zip.
IDG Our WinRAR results were puzzling, apparent to favor lower core counts.
Gaming operation
We have a question: Why would you buy out a 32-core content institution C.P.U. to toy with games? We certainly wouldn't. But IT's a relevant wonder, as numerous people puzzle out by day and play aside night on the Same auto.
With that, we'll set about into a short summary of play performance on the Threadripper 3970X. Even though we're showing entirely four results, we ran many past tests and at different resolutions. The only resoluteness we'atomic number 75 going to demonstrate here is 1920×1080, because higher resolutions you are more GPU-bound, and the differences stick even littler.
First upwards is the reasonably new Shadow of the Tomb Raider at 1920×1080, put across to Highest Quality and with ray tracing turned off. The results are surprisingly good for the Threadripper 3970X which outperforms the two Ryzen 9 CPUs and the 18-nitty-gritty Core i9-10980XE CPU.
IDG In Shadows of the Tomb Raider, the Threadripper 3970X surprisingly outperforms the new Intel CPU and the two Ryzen 9 chips.
Moving onto the mostly GPU-bound Gears of War 5, we see results more in line with what we expected: The higher clocked Core i9-9900K and 9900KS direct the way, with the Ryzen 9 chips cold at their heels. Some of the larger-socket, high-substance count Intel chips come in fourth-year. But differences excursus, all of the CPUs here are producing decent performance, and you can't make the wrong pick.
IDG The 5GHz Core i9's lead the way, but we wouldn't say any of these were performing badly in this GPU-bound gritty.
In Far Cry out 5, however, the results were not good. This game has long haul wagerer on Intel CPUs, and the higher time, the better the performance. We foretold the 18-core Meat i9-10980XE to do better, but its lower clock speeds basically pull dead even with the 12-core and 16-core Ryzen 9 chips.
The biggest failure is the Threadripper 3970X. At 76 fps, it's essentially half arsenic fast as the 5GHz Core i9-9900KS. In that location's genuinely none reason for it to be so often slower when you consider that the Ryzen 9's at least are in the speed. We should also mention that when you start Furthermost Exclaim 5, you get a "Ryzen and Radeon" sort so, yeah.
Clearly, Immoderate Weep 5 runs jolly badly on the Threadripper 3970X. We considered using Ryzen Master to run the game in Game Mode (which switches off some of the compute dies), only it wasn't available at the meter we ran we our tests. We'll consider revisiting this in the future.
IDG It's clear some games such as Far Battle cry 5 will run poorly on the 32-essence Threadripper chip.
Our last game is Gobbler Clancy's Rainbow Six Besieging, which has somewhat low graphics requirements. This is credibly pretty typical of most games, which see the Ryzen CPUs slower past only about 10 percent. Consider that we're using a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, and at a fairly low resolving. These results reinforce our belief that most of the time, the gap 'tween Ryzen and Pith isn't enough for us to leave up the Ryzen CPUs' greater core count.
IDG The Ryzen CPUs are about 10 percentage slower than the Core chips, which is pretty typical in most games.
Performance analysis
Before we close this hit, we wanted to look at the performance of the 32-core Threadripper 3970X using Cinebench R15, ramping from using a single-thread to the maximum threads on the chip. This helps us visualize the military capability of the CPU, A most applications merely can't utilize 64 duds very efficiently.
First of all up, we escort the percent difference between the 32-nitty-gritty Threadripper 3970X and its sibling, the 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X. As you can see, the smaller Ryzen 9 3950X actually has a small advantage on lightly rib workloads—its higher boost clocks give IT up to a 5- to 6-pct advantage over the bragging Threadripper. As you move further to the right though, but get out of the way
IDG Ryzen 9 3950X actually has an advantage on lighter lots, but zipp can touch that 32-core Threadripper 3970X appropriate now.
As well the 16-core Ryzen 9, we also compared Intel's raw 18-core Core i9-10980XE against the 32-core Threadripper 3970X. Yes, some will say that's unfair, because IT's a $2,000 CPU vs. a $1,000 CPU, only it's also readable to to America why Intel slashed prices of the 18-core chip. Remember: Last year's 18-core Core i9-9980XE sold for $1,999, and in a post-Threadripper 3970X world would make no feel at all.
Thusly how does the Core i9-10980XE fare? Well, non better than the Ryzen 9 3950X, anyway. The mighty Threadripper simply outmuscles it.
IDG The 18-core Core i9-10980XE doesn't menu whatsoever better than the Ryzen 9 3950X against the mighty Threadripper.
Intel does have one more card up its sleeve, which we fortunately induce numbers for: The 28-core group Xeon W-3175X. The CPU was made as a showpiece, intended to put AMD's 32-core Threadripper 2990WX in its place. Largely it achieved that with its high time speeds. Merely the 32-core Threadripper 3970X is a different chip.
Although the comparison below is supported performance obtained with a slightly older version of Windows, they're still valid. While the 28-heart and soul Xeon W-3175X actually fares better than the 18-core Core i9 on the right side of the chart where the core counts are closer, it actually performs worse than the 18-core Core i9, overly. Losing by 37 percent is better than losing away 100 percent, but it's standing a loss.
There's an argument that the Xeon W-3175X isn't meant to follow run at stock speeds at all. It's a tacky chip that should be liquid-cooled or liquid-N-cooled for overclocking runs only. But there's also an argument that at $3,000 for the Xeon and $1,800 for the motherboard to run it—IT's not even meant American Samoa a practical political platform.
IDG The flashy Xeon W-3175X gets nearer on multi-threaded performance but its frown clock speeds on lighter loads are worse than the 18-core Core i9 chips.
Conclusion
The 32-core Threadripper 3970X runs unopposed in our eyes. Intel's new 18-core Nucleus i9-10980XE basically has its hands loaded dealing with the 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X. And the 28-core Xeon W-3175X at $5,000 ISN't practical.
Some will complain that $2,000 is too much for this chip. But for anyone WHO actually needs multi-threaded performance that easily outperforms all previous high-core-numeration CPUs, it's almost a bargain.
Source: https://www.pcworld.com/article/398373/amd-threadripper-3970x-review-32-cores-of-unbeatable-power.html
Posted by: crosslenst1948.blogspot.com
0 Response to "AMD Threadripper 3970X Review: 32 cores of unbeatable power - crosslenst1948"
Post a Comment